>Rick,
>
>>It can't be done because of the way the architecture works. Everything has to be rebuilt to run ontop of the CLR. This means re-writing from scratch a product that has a 15 year+ history and codebase. Not only that but you can't take full advantage of native code in the stuff that gets built into the language because it must go at an abstraction layer.
>
>I'm on the same standpoint as you are. But some of use (the community) have suggested to have a compile option to compile to the CLR without eliminating the possibility to compile to the normal VFP P-CODE. What is your standpoint on this ??

That doesn't change the statement above really. Building a CLR version is not a small job as some here seem to think. Given the resources available to the Fox team where would you rather have them spend their time? Doing both only makes that even worse.

It may very well be that we get a CLR version at some point, but I don't think it'll be in VS7... but then you never know.

+++ Rick ---