>>Ed, what was the phrase you used recently, ah yes... "try to reconcile" .... "there isn't event" with "Making the assumption that a SendMessage() 'causes' an event".
>
>I'll let Ed speak for himself, but I don't think his comment was directed at me. Notice that he did say he was amplifying the statement that he quoted.
>
>> Your amplification is probably warranted (and indeed accurate), but the "time to read..." seems a little offensive (and it was not even aimed at me, so I hate to think what Mike makes of it).
>
>Mike agrees with it. :-) Message queues and message loops are foundational to Windows applications, it's best one have an idea how they work before blindly throwing stuff at an application using SendMessage().
Mike,
"I don't think his comment was directed at me". My apology to Ed was posted more than hour before your response. Tut, tut, try to keep up ;-)
censored.