Tamar,
>>Thanks! Yes, it was Bob Casey I was thinking of Tamar. Sorry for the mis-information.
>>
>>I still think my point stands though.
>
>Well, I don't know how many Democratic governers there were then and how many of them got to speak. That would be an interesting question.
>
>FWIW, this year, the Dems did a big thing about honoring Casey (who died within the last year). I thought it was kind of interesting, since as you noted, he'd been outside the mainstream of the party, at least on that issue.
>
>Tamar
Right. I remember them doing that. My take on this was that they were trying to make themselves look like they were more 'moderate', which is kind of like the Emperor's clothes. <g>
Best,
DD
A man is no fool who gives up that which he cannot keep for that which he cannot lose.
Everything I don't understand must be easy!
The difficulty of any task is measured by the capacity of the agent performing the work.
