>>I suppose you speak Esperanto in your daily life, then.
>>
>>I'm afraid the generalist philosophy has been tried and discarded in almost every sphere of endeavour known to humankind, except possibly medicine. It was Wells who said that "the essence of civilisation is specialisation". He was right. Targeted tools and people are not "better" but they can do a better job because they can afford to focus on their niche and get very good at it. Specialisation is the sign of a maturing industry/profession or individual. The populist "generalist" or "multi-skilling" theory we see today is another "dumbing down" idea to diffuse expertise and keep plodders looking good.
>>
>
>Blah blah blah...... Cut through the bullshit John....< s >...
>
>
>>
>Fact: ADO is SLOOOOOW compared to the dedicated mechanisms in tools like VFP, Delphi and increasingly Java. If you use ADO everywhere, you'd better have a better explanation for the cost you are imposing on clients than the "fact that it is generic" and therefore necessarily better.
>>
>
>As a statement of fact, you have no way to back this up. All I need to do is provide one example where this statement is proved incorrect. Shall I do that?
>
>
>< JVP >

I would like to see a speed comparison of ADO vs. VFP cursors. In other words, I would be very interested in ADO if it is as speedy or close to as speedy as VFP, and can do everything that VFP can do.