General information
Category:
Coding, syntax & commands
Alex
Thank you for your kind response and sugestions. I think too that OOP is great and powerful staff and I been using it in C++ even before VFP did exist. But my point is: having full @SAY backward compatibility would hurt OOP as much as its lack is hurting programers to port their apps?.
Consider this scenario: I have this huge FPW app affected by the "fast CPU" sindrome, even I did any patch and trick on the book. It wont be profitable to make a whole redo but I still could make a buck if I convert it.
I think the VFP converter wizard does a good job at it but then you have to spend time in this kind of issues, otherwise avoided.
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only