> >To Mark, I will look into the TableUpdate, TableRevet, ... Is this the oppsite of using the 'm.' memory varibles steps? > >I really will have to study what is 'Init' really is. > >Chuck >
Hi Chuck,
Using the memory variable approach does not require any buffering of your tables at all. You use the tables just as you did in 2.6.
To each their own, but I prefer the buffering method as Mark described it.
