>Mike,
>
>>And then there's the template (or "script", as I believe IntelliSense calls it) that creates a template for a COM server, and also sets up a template for the COM methods to autmatically stick it in MTS/COM+. It's all pretty rough, but if there's enough hue and cry for it, I can bring it to the proper authorities for consideration.
>
>Even if it's still rough, I recommend that you guys ship as many of those as possible, perhaps in a separate DBF with a disclaimer about it being "test" code, as an example of ideas for extending code completion and Intellisense. That way, those who are interested in it can pull in those records, and yet you won't have to deal with tech support issues.

I second that motion.