>>>Define "speaking disrespectfully." I wouldn't speak disrespectfully of the OFFICE of president, but he is a different story. I have no respect for him whatsoever. He is lower than whale dung,IMHO. As for the office, it is one I hold in high esteem.
>>
>>John,
>>
>>Well, look, I think what Mr. Clinton stands for and did are both reprehensible. Even then I don't like to speak against him in the sense of anger or the other kinds of emotions that I don't think are the kinds I should have towards anyone. Remember that phrase about the word 'raca'? <g>
>
>
>I've NEVER used the word raca in an emotional way.*g* Even so, I believe there was this instance when some people were defiling the temple (money changers) and they were not handled lightly. While I don't get too worked up about him, he needs to face his deeds/misdeeds and pay the price. I know they'll never send him to prison, but that's exactly where you or I would be.

John,

Sure.. If Mr. Clinton has broken any laws worthy of prosecution and is convicted he should be treated just like any other citizen in that case.

I think what has galled me the most is their apparent presumption that they are somehow above the law.. Has to be very tough on the military and law enforcement folks to see Mr. Clinton flaunt the law of the land...