>I don't believe that there any deliberate anti-Linux bias on the part of the UT. If there is a shortage of Linux articles on the UT I think submitting articles for posting on the front page would be a more positive solution than taking the UT to task over it.

I would like to believe that too. It's the wording of the headlines and the lack of followups that get to me. Is every single article that is posted submitted? I doubt it.
When there's a MS follie, there is always a follow-up (and I'm sure they research it a bit too. If they don't they are stupid for blindly posting.)

j