>
>Marc,
>
>Granny awards?

Sometimes I wonder if these typoes are Freudian ...

>
>Nope, no Rule #3 for us. Seriously, I have no qualms about engaging in spirited, even passionate, debate over an issue. However, there must be a foundation of respect. Without it, debate turns into a shouting match. I also think that we sometimes can take these things (and ourselves) far too seriously. When this happens, people get "me-centric", and forget to be considerate of others. I mean there are a few more important issues going on out in the world, aren't there?
>
On the other hand, there is nothing like a good hot debate, is there? It gives you the opportunity to express your thoughts and even change your mind (you will not be surprised if I tell you that I find this a difficult thing to do). The me-centricity is a small price to pay, as long as it remains within the limits.

>I consider you and all of the folks here at the UT an invaluable resource. Thanks for sharing your opinions.

Thanks for me and for all the folks ... Likewise BTW.

>
>And finally, since some of (yours truly included) sometimes seem bent on turning this into the "Laffs-R-Us", a little culture:

Here I'm lost. I keep trying to say this loud, but "Laffs-R-Us", is really beyond my comprehension. Help.

>
>"I may disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Voltaire
>
Fooooiiiie. I _am_ impressed. You must have Quotation CD on line no? :)

Regards,

Marc