>Seriously though,
>
>I believe that VFP should be removed from VS because:
>
Your argument presupposes that VFP wouldn't be backwardly compatable. MS has already said they aren't committing the resources to make VFP play in the CLR, so that means we stay backwardly compatable. We can still stay in the box, if for no other reason that marketing strength.
John Harvey
Shelbynet.com
"I'm addicted to placebos. I could quit, but it wouldn't matter." Stephen Wright