Alex,
>Doug,
>
>I did not say being labeled a conservative is axiomatically 'bad'. I was quoting Doonesbury's Sunday cartoon.
>
>No being labeled 'ultra' something (e.g. an extremist) seems bad to me.
I don't quite understand the above sentence. I'm thinking that you meant to say that being labeled (as opposed to not being labelled?) seems bad to you.
Is that a proper reading?
If so I'd respond by asking why you let the labels that others place on 3rd parties influence your thinking so much? Goodness, I could say just about anything about anyone then and as long as I put the word 'extremist' on it you'd believe me? I hardly think you'd do that.
This is kind of my point.. Rather than let other do our thinking for us let's reclaim our ability to think for ourselves.
You and I both know that not all liberals are 'bad' nor are all conservatives 'good' or visa versa. THough I have my doubts about liberals.. <g>
In essence you have made my point.
Thanks! <g>
>
>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>Yeah, but to assume that becaus one is conservative that one is axiomatically 'bad' is something of a logical no-no. That is, unless I can respond with my own gratuitous assertion that is someone is liberal they are automatically stupid. <g>
>>
>>And, particularly when those who assert a conservative's 'badness' also assert that there is no right or wrong.
>>
>>Life must be horribly confusing! *bg*
>>>>>>>>>>>
Best,
DD
A man is no fool who gives up that which he cannot keep for that which he cannot lose.
Everything I don't understand must be easy!
The difficulty of any task is measured by the capacity of the agent performing the work.