General information
Forum:
Microsoft SQL Server
>That's an interesting idea JC. I'm still waiting for a call-back from our local Microsoft rep. on the licensing issue. We've already decided that if we need to purchase a bunch of licenses for replication we'll look into "rolling our own." I read a little about how it works in SQL Server. Apparently, most of it is SP based anyway.
>
>I'll post my findings here.
>
>Persisted recordsets is an ADO thing, right?
>
>Marty
>
>
Right. Now, I've never heard about doing replication with SP's so thanks for the idea.
>>
>>Does it have to be a replication solution? You can also use persisted recordsets and make batch updates to the central server.
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only