>>Thanks for the clarification. To me, I see a conflict in the NDA. What is in Beta 1 is certainly in Beta 2. Trying to figure out what can and can not be discussed can be tricky. I guess if you only have Beta 1 and are not participating in Beta 2, you should be safe. However, if you are just starting with Beta 2, you need to be sure if you discuss anything it is only features in Beta 1. Sheesh.
>
>I've always wondered if admitting you were under an NDA was a violation of the NDA (not that I'm under one, of course). Wait a second...if you're under an NDA, but say that you're not under an NDA does that violate the NDA?:-)

You can say you are under an NDA, you just can't say for what or for whom. < g > The best example of working under an NDA has been the Clintons during their 8 years in office. Hillary is still under one. < gd&r >