>>>>Yup. Positive. I remember going to a meeting at the offices of dlesko, the company that made funcky. Dirk Lesko was talking about what is OOP and compared it to the procedural code we were used to developing.
>>>
>>>Clipper 5.O OOP??? I don't think so. I've used Clipper Summer 87 until 5.0. The latter wasn't even an Object Based one. No inheritance, etc.
>>
>
>Craig,
>
>I will believe you if you based your claim on your personal experience. If you did used it, then I challenge you to educate me with kindness by explaining how Inheritance/Subclassing, Polymorphism, and Encapsulation/Abstraction works with Clipper 5.0 that makes it OOP. :)


It's been waaay too long since I did anything with Clipper to give you specific examples.