> >I think rather than Visual FoxBasic (VFB), what you want for this >application is Visual FoxBasic for Applications (VFBA). VFBA is probably >best suited to mimic the "look and feel" of Access. I had a beta a while >back (build date 04/01/97) and it started choking on tables that had more >than 20,000 records, just like Access. It also seemed to have similar >performance traits as Access when more than 4 or 5 users attempted to >utilize the application at the same time. Unfortunately, Visual FoxBasic >for Applications has suffered from a curious lack of marketing from >Microsoft. I've started to suspect that this apparent snub might be due >to reports of a horrible new macro virus which can attach itself to your >database tables. > Excellent! Now I have it all in perspective.