Jay Johengen
Altamahaw-Ossipee, North Carolina, United States
>>I think I misunderstood that. In lurking through the posts between you and Craig (and John Peterson?), I got the impression it was proposed to be a replacement for the table foundation used now.
Let's make no mistake ... 2-way with text WOULD/SHOULD eliminate VCX's etc.
I say it's not a "foundation change", because for the "majority" (IMO), the fact that Forms, etc. are backed up by "text" vs "DBF's" is totally irrelevant; ie. the change would be transparent.
A library is a library, whether it's in the form of a .PRG or a .VCX.
It's like asking a "user": "Would you like an SQL Server or an Oracle backend ?" Huh?
Some people don't "want" to give up VCX's, etc. ... but I'm still waiting for a single concrete reason as to why they need to be kept around (other than "that's they way it's always been").
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only