>>Possibly a semantical thing (as regards "produce binary")... are the "tokens" all clearly identifiable as 'regular' readable discernible characters similar to the ones in the text of this message? They weren't last time I cared to look. That could lead someone to use the term "binary".
>>
>>Just a thought
>>
>>JimN
>>
>Well, just open up an FXP file and take a look. No, very little of it is recognizable, except for some literal strings and such. The point is that there's no difference between what a class runs and any other program in VFP.

No, *my* point was that a person could confuse what he sees in a FXP with binary information. Arguably it is, though FXPs are not "binaries" as implied in the MS and PC world generally.
To rag on someone for using a word that does not match a strictly technical definition is not helpful unless "binaries" is also explained.

JimN