>I agree that they didn't many other choices (O/S2, Linux, and (Wordperfect, IBM Suite?) but they could have waited for more stable versions of the MS offerings.
Prior to Window 95 the only window os that was available for PC was windows 3.1x
and not much anything else, and 3.1x was 16 bit. So if you wanted to go to 32 bit on your PC, you had very little choice but to use windows 95.
>You believe most users are discouraged from using a software once they know there is a flaw, and I believe most users' expectations are so low that they will accept anything...
If so, I guess we have no choice but to give them inferior product?
Don't know about you, but my users expect alot, not perfection, but alot.
Work as if you don't need money
Love as if you've never been hurt before
Live as if this is your last day to live
Dance as if no one's watching
