>>>>In this case, it means marketing has gotten hold of it.
>>>
>>>(as I sit here grinning and shaking my head)
>>>
>>>Craaaaig, Your not being cynical again are you?
>>
>>
>>It's all marketing. Why do you think that OLE became ActiveX then COM then COM+ then .Net?
>
>COM+ is actually different than COM and the two are not the same. COM+ are component services - COM+ Applications, Queued Components, COM+ Events and the entire concept of COM objects hosted in COM+ Application container...
>
>I think that message was never clearly made from Microsoft though <s>...
>
>.NET actually relies on COM+ for its scalability features, and it's process hosting services, so COM+ at least is alive and well. And since COM+ is based on the COM subsystem - there's no chance any of COM will go away anytime soon.

Well I guess your first statement above was the equal of any MS statement on the subject.