>It's too valuable a tool for it to be optional. I see questions around here all the time (and I'm sure that you do too) about running a batch (.BAT) file from within Windows. That's what the WSH is, batch files for Windows, only they're batch files on steriods.:-) I use one as an application launcher. It checks the network drive to see if a new version of the application exists and/or if there needs to be a new install (SP, version change, etc.). Does all the dirty work for me (and the user).
I haven't gotten into using WSH, but it sounds useful. I needed to do something in a batch file once at home and asked my husband (also a CS person) if he knew how. He didn't, so I said I would try and find out if it can be done in WSH. He looked shocked that I was dumb enough not to have disabled that already. Sigh. I just can't see turning off a perfectly useful feature just because some people don't have the sense not to open attachements. Especially since I'm the only one using the computer and I _do_ have sense. :)
>You won't have any problems under Win2K with versions of VFP above 5.0. Win95 is another story.
I haven't used 95 in ages. I like W2k much better. I have Win 98SE at home and I'm considering upgrading, but can't decide if I want to go to Win2k or XP. Probably Win2k because of problems with XP, but I'll wait and see if they get resolved first.
Michelle
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only