>>>There were no rules to begin with. I chose to suggest a method used here in the States -- a runoff between top 2 [3 because of tie for second] because NO suggestion got a majority.
>>
>>I like this. I will back you on this if you choose to pursue it.
>
>I will pursue it. I just placed a summary of every vote at the bottom of that wiki page with an explanation at the top. I did not include those who indicated 2 or more favorites. Unless there is a tie for second, the top 2 should be placed in a runoff so we can get a name with a majority vote. If one name gets a mafority before a runoff, then a runoff is not necessary. At least in the States that is how it is. But we could have a runoff regardless.

Thanks Mark. I think this can work nicely. Given time zones, people's accessibility to the internet generally and Ken's deadline, the runoff part may be a problem. But votes may make the need moot.

Sounds like one hell of a machine you just got. All those extra gigs must really weigh it down < s >.