Good question.

I'd call it a bug, but it may be a result of tightening up the DBC as new features like database events were added to the language.

If any one knows the correct answer to this question, let me know.


>Is this a bug, or a planned/documented change in functionality?
>
>
>>My biggest problem with 7.0 is you can no longer create "temporary" indexes of tables in a read only DBC. (read non-structural, i.e. INDEX ON TO TEMP.IDX). This worked fine in 6.0 but doesn't in 7.0. My solution: free tables. Not the solution I would have sought, but workable.
>>