Tony,

SNIP
>
>I think any company that puts out a product be it software, hardware, or whatever and states it's safe and secure, owes it to their customers to info them otherwise when they are made aware of the problem. That's a stand up company or person. They don't need to tell me what the details are, they just need to tell me it's not safe or secure. Once I start to use their product ( taking the companies word that it's safe) and I bank my financial future on it, it becomes my problem when it's found not to be safe.
>
>I don't think that's too much to ask.

Well put. But you've struck upon the reason why I think it's gotta be "full disclosure" (xxx doesn't work correctly when yyy and zzz) rather than "disclosure" (the product isn't safe any more).
The second statement is a death knell for the product while the first instance more or less turns it around into being an advantage.

Jim Nelson