Vlad,
True. Also, for the UT, remember that every page that's brought up is really 2 or more (depending on configuration) back-end hits since it's using frames. Also, I would classify the UT as busy. I think there are many sites out there that have spent a million bucks on Oracle backends, etc. that don't get nearly as much traffic...
>Hi!
>
>100 users logged on simultaneously to UT site does not means 100 users try to get some messages from the site at the same time. Always remember that there is a very big difference between the usual desktop VFP application and WEB application.
>
>Though, indeed, UT site performance is really good.
>
>>My impression of the UT is that performance is great even when I've seen it over 100 users. Why go to a more complex setup if you don't have to?
>>>Russel,
>>>
>>>My take wasn't that it's all the cuncurrent users they're able to have, just how many they do have. You may be right though...
>>>
>>>Renoir
>>>
>>>>Well, that is quite interesting, but I wonder about the 90 concurrent users when there are 6000 users registered on it. That means that 1.5% of the users can be on at once. Obviously, in most systems only a percentage of the users are on at once and it could be quite small, like 10 or 15 or 20 percent, but 1.5%? As much as I love VFP, it makes me wonder if they should move to some other back-end.
>>>>
>>>>>>where?
>>>>>>>While looking at the list of World Wide Visual FoxPro applications, I notice a new one today. It has 1185 tables, have 6000 users using it and support up to 90 concurrent users. Well done!
>>>>>
>>>>>In the Visual FoxPro Zone