>>Sorry to ask this again, because I know some months ago this was dealt with, but I don't know what to search for.
>>
>>Why nowadays the LI tags are not allowed anymore ? This worked before, (without UL). See Thread #
558803 Message #
562903 for the example.
>>
>>As it looks to me, before there must have been some Java (or so) in the Message that allowed it, or better : today there is some that prevents it from working. But then, how would it be possible that the OLD Message still can be replied upon ? (like Message #
562903). Can't understand this.
>>
>>Wouldn't you say that it is a rather necessary thing ? (but including UL please because of indenting).
>>Sorry to bring this up again.
>
>There is no restriction for LI but there is for UL.
Is there any potential problem if you enable UL?
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
