Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Manuals and trees
Message
De
17/01/2002 11:35:20
 
 
À
17/01/2002 10:33:24
Information générale
Forum:
Politics
Catégorie:
Autre
Divers
Thread ID:
00605603
Message ID:
00606149
Vues:
23
Any timber company that works the way it did in the 1980's is totally irresponsible. The best example of Environmental Forestry is Plum Creek Timber. You can see their timber management practices and independent audits at www.plumcreek.com.

>
>If Norse and Morrison are correct, unprotected old-growth in the Northwest would disappear within 30 to 40 years at recent logging rates (approximately 19,000 hectares/year). However, since so much of what remains is fragmented or otherwise compromised by proximity to roads and clearcuts, the ecologically viable old-growth forest area outside of protected area could disappear far faster. According to Norse, with logging rates and harvesting patterns similar to those of the 1980's, any old growth forest remaining outside of protected areas would come under the damaging influence of windthrow and radical microclimatic shifts within 20-25 years.
Craig Berntson
MCSD, Microsoft .Net MVP, Grape City Community Influencer
Précédent
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform