>Gil,
>
>>I don't think I'm missing something here.
>
>Neither do I < g >.
>
>You're right...the code in the business object on the form is unnecessary...the code on the forms works without the IF condition that exists in the parent because the instance that's dropped on the form *is* the primary business object and it *is* on a form.
>
I knew that it still worked, but I was concerned that you had left yourself open to ridicule from someone looking at that piece of code and saying "I thought business objects weren't supposed to directly call a 'form' PEM." And what's even more amazing is that I recognized this as not n-tier.


>
>P.S. It was good seeing you again at the Potomac Area User Group last week...although I didn't weep on the outside, I was weeping "openly" internally (if that makes sense).
>
Makes perfect sense to me! < g > BTW, the guy with me is Bob Reagan, who's purchased the framework too and who I am trying to convince to get his company to spring for a week's training in Charlottesville... He was driving so I had to leave with him, but we both liked your talk and where you're heading. We want to hop on that train.