>>
>True, but it makes for good editorializing... and since VB has not been OOP until next month, I am pretty comfortable with those unsubstantiated generalizations! <g>
><
>
>While VB was not an OOP language - you could employ OOP with it... The only thing lacking was inheritence. An important thing. But, as I proved with DataClas COM - not only could OO techniques be appled with VB 6 - I even managed to create a small application framework...

I've been reading the Design Patterns book lately, and I found it interesting that inheritance was downplayed in favor object composition. In any case, decorating an object is a valid alternative to subclassing, and it seems that the technique could be used with VB6.