>Sorry, George, but I can't accept this as a good reason to define all classes in PRGs and give up using the class designer. I don't think it worths it.
>
>Vlad
>
>>One reason is that the memory required for PRGs is significantly less than VCXs. This is something that I had heard, but never tested until now. I created a simple class with one custom property and one custom method. Using SYS(1016), I measured how much memory was used by these objects. The PRG used approximately 11K less than the VCX. I test this twice, re-starting VFP each time with the same results.
>>
>>In general, I use both, depending strictly on what the class is designed to do and work with.
>>
>>George
It's strictly a matter of style and design, Vlad. Neither one is inherently better than the other. They both have their strong points and weak ones, as well.
George
George
Ubi caritas et amor, deus ibi est