>Hi Cetin,
>
>Snipped.
>
>A problem might arise if views used simply DBCName!tablename instead of pathing the DBC but I think anyone using same names should be prepared for it.
>
>The above and any further potential problems was what I was fishing for. What about RI? Any others? I want to be prepared. Thanks for the example.

Jim,
All let you fully specify the DBC and tablename. Being honest I'm lazy to be too much carefull and therefore don't do it myself :)
Changing the DBC name is easier for me.
BTW the biggest problem for me was to play with a table in low level when it was in a DBC :)
Cetin