>The judge admited to giving an unjustified score, they threw out the scores she gave and the two pairs were tied. Seems pretty clear cut.

I understand what happened. Wether or not thats fair is a different story. Also, if its this clear cut, why must the investigation continue? This is a tough scenario, and teh answers haven't been found yet, but in the meantime, gold medals were thrown out to make it look like everything's been resolved.

It seems to me that regardless of what the investigation finds, and who the real winner is determined to be will be pointless because there is no way that the ISU will retract the 4 golds it gave.

>What's lamer is trying to pass off the above statement as an argument. Hehe

Which statement?