>>
>Nadya,
>>>
>>>You haven't mentioned what buffer mode is in effect.
>>>
>>>I mention this only because it seems to be implicated in a documented REPLACE bug - see Q142397.>>
>>This article is irrelevant to the Nadya's situation
>
>I
knew that it did not apply to Nadya's situation. Am I that stupid???
>The article described a problem with REPLACE AND suggested that buffering could have some impact on the bug reported. And "I mention this only because..." should have conveyed that I KNEW that it did not apply.
>
You lost me here.
>>
>>
>I would suggest that you report this as a bug, but given that such reports go into a black hole with NO FEEDBACK whatsoever, you would really be wasting your time.>>
>>The unreported bugs certanly wouldn't be fixed.
>
>Yes, and apparently a goodly number of the reported ones too! Since we can't KNOW, given the present circumstances, my recommendation is don't waste the effort.
>When there is some feedback mechanism in place I will change my thoughts on this.
I respect your position but find your recomendation illogical. How not reporting bugs to MS would help to fix them or help anythig for that metter?
--sb--