>Whoa there Big Boy - I don't think Denis was complaining - your just misinterpretting. I think some developers have better things to do than update the framework topic on the Wiki. Just because somebody doesn't update your particular Wiki topic doesn't make them off-side either.

I don't aruge that fact. I only say that our time would be better spent updating the chart instead of "observing" how it may be outdated and biased.

As Steven Black said on the codemine page "Interesting to see interjections and point-counterpoint in an ad :-)-- StevenBlack"

Denis is advising the creator of this thread to look only at the ads because the wiki may be biased and outdated. The chart attempts to provide an unbiased feature list and be as updated as possible.


>
>In fact, both Denis and I both use Codemine and the last time I looked, Dave Lehr from Soft Classics walked straight into a load of stick for mentioning why Codemine does certain things in certain ways. I wouldn't be suprised if Dave never visited the Wiki again.
>
>-=Gary
>
>>Well, don't contribute and don't complain when others are trying to provide valuable independant reviews.
>>>>Nothing is up to date. Newspapers are hours old
>>>
>>>Frameworks don't change hourly <g>
>>>
>>>>magazines are months old.
>>>
>>>How would it be possible ot keep a magazine up to date? print issues every 15 minutes. Come on be serious.
>>>
>>>>Vendors' websites are not necessarily updated more frequently.
>>>
>>>If and when that's the case it gives a good idea of how serious they are about their tool. But there could also be good reasons for that. For example preparing to release a major version of a framework. I'll always prefer a better framework over a terrific web site. After the framework has been released they'll have time to fix the web site. That's why somebody looking to buy a framework should always contact the makers before making a buying decision.
>>>
>>>>Most vendors will say whatever they need to sell products (as far as I know none of the framework vendors have ever said anything dishonest).
>>>
>>>You give weight to what I was saying. They should update info about their frameworks if they don't say nothing dishonest.
>>>
>>>>You're either part of the solution of part of the problem.
>>>
>>>Does that mean that because I don't contribute I'm part of problem? Weird logic here. Perhaps that's the reason I don't contribute. I don't want to be a part of the problem <g>