>I don't aruge that fact. I only say that our time would be better spent updating the chart instead of "observing" how it may be outdated and biased.

Well its as clear as day that as you are the framework comparison keeper, you have seen your arse and taken Denis' comment far too personally.

>As Steven Black said on the codemine page "Interesting to see interjections and point-counterpoint in an ad :-)-- StevenBlack"

So what?

>Denis is advising the creator of this thread to look only at the ads because the wiki may be biased and outdated. The chart attempts to provide an unbiased feature list and be as updated as possible.

Well, if someone looked at the comparison chart right now, they wouldn't have a clue about Codemine 7 and may decide to buy Mere Mortals on the basis of your comparison. Is that an appropriate outcome? Your feature comparison says nothing about what makes Codemine excellent. So if I made a a buying decision, I might buy one framework over another because it has WC integration, and a DD and it sports an Abstract Factory. When I try and use that framework, despite it being Top of the Pops on your comparison list, it might be bobbins to use.

So, very brief overview - look at the Wiki comparison list but don't buy exclusively because of the comparison list because it may not be up to date - eg., Codemine 7 is not even mentioned.

Isn't this more or less what Denis said to the originator of this thread and in this case, he would be right, wouldn't he ?

So, no one is criticising your efforts on the Wiki. It just doesn't tell the whole story.

-=Gary