>It's doubtful that the "frequency count" will be raised, because the extreme likelihood is that the reported bug will not be reproducible, as amply demonstrated here many times.

I think you would have a difficult time backing that up. It's not very often that someone posts a bug that I can't reproduce (assuming there are good steps to reproduce, otherwise I will likely ignore it).

On a sidenote, please do send the error reports generated by Doc Watson (why name a debugging tool after a bluegrass artist?). In the case of those reports, we most certainly pay attention to the frequency of a particular "bucket".

> There is apparently some criteria that is used to decide if a bug gets a KB article or not.

You're right, there is. It's called "there's only so many hours in a day".