SNIP
>Another reason to advocate C# for any long term plans (I'm thinking 5-10 years, maybe sooner) is the fact that C# is teh ECMA standard of the group. That means, whatever .NET languages get ported to OS's like Linux, Palm, or systems yet unknown, the chances are that your C# code will run on them, while the code based on proprietary VB.NET needs to be ported.
Well, if this is true, and I don't doubt your words Mike, then IN GENERAL while I could pick up VB.NET faster as a VFP programmer (however, that is probably NOT true for me, as I also program in Delphi and C# is closer to Delphi), it would behoove me to spend the energy in learning C# instead...
OF course, we still must consider the 'job market' as usual. We'll have to see during the next couple of years where the greatest need is too...
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"