>Maybe because he feels he at least deserves a response? At least a, "Yeah, those look like valid complaints, I'll look into getting them fixed...". Sounds reasonable enough to me.
>

Agreed. The only reason I took the time to type a response was the tone Charles' reponses were taking (I really didn't believe I could change his attitude or demeanor with one post in this environment -- if only my posts had that power <g>). It's one thing to have a business issue with the framework -- we've all found bugs at one time or another. The horse takes on an entirely different color once professional issues become personal attacks.


>However, I agree with you that the baiting thing was just, well, weird. I prefer the direct "Hey, how are those bug fixes coming along"? approach.

Yep, that's what I'm talking about. I guess I'm just used to this being one of the more professional areas of the UT, minus the sarcasm, biting remarks, and condescension. We're all hear to do our jobs and learn. I'll stop here lest the strains of "Kumbaya" begin!

Take care,
---J