It's all subjective. Perhaps stuffing cotton in medicine bottles is intellectually stimulating for some. My point is that to discard dotNET on a per se basis because of one blow hard is rediculous.

To everything there is a risk, but without risk, there is next to no reward.



>John,
>
>> What you do needs to be intellectually challenging as well. Just because
>> something pays well, if it is boring, that fact is relevant. That is why
>> it is often bad advice to do something just because it pays well. Usually,
>> the collateral effects outweigh the financial reward.
>
>Not necessarily. How much does the financial rewards compare to the
>intellectual stimulation is dependent on the individual, and it's not for
>Stephen, you, or me to decide what an individual should decide.
>
>To learn more about this subject, pick up a Math, Economics, or Actuarial
>Science book on Risk Theory and search for Utility Function. Warning: the
>math may be too advanced for the casual reader to fully understand the
>subject.
>
>Daniel