You've probably seen Ken's posts that he's working on it.
>I agree with you absolutely.
>
>Firstly. Why Microsoft spread their "Microsoft Internet Explorer" logo? And why not "Microsoft Visual FoxPro" logo?
>
>Secondly. In many countries (for example in Russia) lighting sign mean danger. What dangerous is in FoxPro? I think nothing, because it is only the best MS tool for developers. Logo has to be friendlier.
>
>Thirdly. It would be great if Ken spend some money from VFP advertisement budget for professional developing as minimum as three type of VFP logo:
>
>- 88*31 pixel GIF file with animation (for web)
>- 88*31 pixel GIF file without animation (for web)
>- something bigger (for application use)
>
>Sorry if I wrote something wrong, but I think it is important part of the advertisement company...
>
>>While the logo does look professional, its not something I'll use. I don't associate the picture of the fox with VFP. It's also bigger than I would like. The small "FrontPage" or "SQL Server" logos that you see on some web sites is better suited.
Craig Berntson
MCSD, Microsoft .Net MVP, Grape City Community Influencer