Liar!

John, please tell us the story about precisely why Ken granted you an MVP, and what you promised to do this year in return.

Have you no shame?

**--** Steve



><<
>Oh, and by the way, you criticise somebody who was a MVP who had large message counts but low technical accuracy. Well, at least he *tried* to answer technical questions.
><<
>
>The award is for PAST work, not what one does currently. I will be the first to admit that in the past year, my technical posting level does not warrant the award for 2002.
>
>I think that hits the salient part of your post...