<<
Oh, and by the way, you criticise somebody who was a MVP who had large message counts but low technical accuracy. Well, at least he *tried* to answer technical questions.
<<
The award is for PAST work, not what one does currently. I will be the first to admit that in the past year, my technical posting level does not warrant the award for 2002.
I think that hits the salient part of your post...
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only