>I read an article in PC World (January). It is on page 292. It talks about FoxPro 2.01 a little bit but then later makes statements that could be taken to mean FoxPro in general. I sent the author an e-mail message letting him know that FoxPro has come a long way since 1988.
>
>I think if you read the article, you may also be inclined to do the same. If you do send an e-mail message, please be very polite. This person is just a little under-informed.
>
>Joe

Joe,

For anyone who doesn't get the magazine, the link is:

http://www.pcworld.com/software/database/articles/jan98/1601p292.html

Just as a side note. I don't believe that there ever was a "FoxPro" 2.01, FoxBASE yes, FoxPro no, and it's FoxBASE that this guy is talking about. How up-to-date is that?

George