>>I read an article in PC World (January). It is on page 292. It talks about FoxPro 2.01 a little bit but then later makes statements that could be taken to mean FoxPro in general. I sent the author an e-mail message letting him know that FoxPro has come a long way since 1988.
>>
>>I think if you read the article, you may also be inclined to do the same. If you do send an e-mail message, please be very polite. This person is just a little under-informed.
>>
>>Joe
>
>Joe,
>
>For anyone who doesn't get the magazine, the link is:
>
>http://www.pcworld.com/software/database/articles/jan98/1601p292.html
>
>Just as a side note. I don't believe that there ever was a "FoxPro" 2.01, FoxBASE yes, FoxPro no, and it's FoxBASE that this guy is talking about. How up-to-date is that?
>
>George

Not very...

I think if they got a bunch of e-mail/letters saying "Hey Visual FoxPro is great! Wake up!", they might even be inclined to publish one of the letters or maybe even write a little article about VFP. Would a little free advertsing be nice?

Joe