>Why is it Michael's problem? He is allowed to express his opinion. Or, does he need to keep it in check for the sake of harmony???

It's not for the sake of harmony, the goal is non-existant.

>Of course it will cause conflict. That is the goal, that is the purpose.

If that is Michael's goal (to cause conflict) and that is the outcome, what are the benefits?

>Conflict and opposing points of view are good thing, not a bad thing to be swept under the rug.

I agree, but nevertheless, this post will still be swept under rug, just like all the others that cause so much conflict. Conflicts can be resolved, but they never are.

Kev

*SNIP*