>>Why is it Michael's problem? He is allowed to express his opinion. Or, does he need to keep it in check for the sake of harmony???
>
>It's not for the sake of harmony, the goal is non-existant.
>

The goal is to present an opposing POV...


>>Of course it will cause conflict. That is the goal, that is the purpose.
>
>If that is Michael's goal (to cause conflict) and that is the outcome, what are the benefits?
>

To present an opposing POV

>>Conflict and opposing points of view are good thing, not a bad thing to be swept under the rug.
>
>I agree, but nevertheless, this post will still be swept under rug,

I would not count on that...