JVP:>>Because I am trying to prevent people from wasting their time... It is a complete EIF. MS owns and controls the product. The crtical path of success runs through MS. Without their blessing, help, and support, what you propose will not happen.
>
Walter:>well, well. This would be the last thing the large majority of this community is thinking you're doing. All you are is beeing destructive in stead of constructive. You've never showed to be an experienced developer, but always try to belittle the strenghts of VFP.
>
>You're not able to judge what is best for people, so please stop this nonsense. VFP still is the most logical choice in data intensive solotions. No other language can beat the data munging capabilities of VFP which is build on both a set and record oriented approach.
>
>As far as I know you're not GOD so, you can't know how the near future for a VFP looks like.
>
>No, AFAIC, you're nothing more than someone trying to be an evangelist trying to preach something noone else really believes in and has absolutely no warm feelings for the VFP language. Your egocentric attitude uncovers that your presence here is only for your own amusements and has nothing to do with trying to help others (As you're belittling people who disagree with you, Joe Bob).
>
>Let me say it again: People themselve know what is best for them. Programming skills are largely language-independed. When I look at the papers I do not see any requirement for .NET here. Even VB is somewhat rare. Managers here are getting wiser by seeing that following every hype will result in disasters.
>
>Sure .NET has a future. Are VFP and .NEt mutual exclusive. Of course not ! What are you talking about then. I'm writing FP/VFP for about 9 years now. Sure I've seen other languages come popular. Should I've jumped the boat with the occurance with VB, Delphi and MS Access ? Would this beneficial for my skills ? Of course not. I'd still be wondering what this 'inheritance' was all about and would not have been total lost when someone was talking about frameworks.
>
>Well, If you want to give an advise for people to learn: Now that MS has bought Navision Financials with the interessting propetary database with flowfields and sumindexes I expect a lot of improvements in its UI. Learn Navision and be a consultant and earn a lot of money if you're good.
>
>Whether you like it or not the big bucks are not in programming. they are on a much higher level. So if you're trying to get people a brighter financial future then get them out of programming onto a higher level in the IT business. Jumping from one to another language is a waste of resource unless you've no other choice.
>
>Walter,

Thanks, Walter, for your post. I also agree with your main point: "Don't be destructive if you can't be constructive."

Ahmed Siddiqui
Software Project Manager
Conley's Mfg. & Sales.