Ron,

Great! Hope it helps! We've got a lot of the Wrox books and most of them are pretty good. I'm using C# though, so that VB book won't do me much good, but maybe others who are using VB should check it out.

~~Bonnie


>Bonnie,
>
>Just purchased a great book today on VB.Net Classes. Visual Basic.Net Class Design Handbook
>
>Wrox.
>
>Highly recommend from what I have read so far.
>
>>Lots of stuff *does* change. <g> But, any sound OOP practice that we did in VFP should also be sound OOP practice in any other language! =) (although I suppose .NET *does* have *some* issues.)
>>
>>
>>
>>>You change languages and feel everything changes. I don't know why I did not research SubClass first I always do with VFP. I just did and found several threads. Thanks.
>>>
>>>Thanks.
>>>
>>>>Ron,
>>>>
>>>>That question was asked here a week or two ago and the answer is yes. We've done it for most of the common objects. Now, whether others who don't have our VFP background consider it normal practice or not, I have no idea. But it's *definitely* a good idea.
>>>>
>>>>~~Bonnie
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Would you consider it normal practice in .NET to subclass all the base classes (I am really only thinking of GUI control classes here) as is the suggested method to start developing in VFP. This has worked very well for me in VFP.
>>>>>
>>>>>Is there a doc that describes this anywhere ?