>Though I don't actually recall it all, I do recall that FoxBase already allowed for more records, AND that somewhere in time Fox allowed for the 2GB.
>Think of the 286 time. I don't think it would allow for that many addresses. Add to this (as what I recall) that at some stage Fox needed the 386.
Hmmm... that is possible. I did work with dBASE III and dBASE III Plus, but at that time, I definitely did not work with multi-MB databases.
For Nick: I would check the manuals or help - there
might be a section on system capabilities or something. I don't have dBASE III handy right now.
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
