In your message that I was responding to, you mentioned having 10-100 senators per state. That would be a huge increase in the salary needed to pay our government. And you're assuming that you can get them to reduce their salaries? I don't want higher taxes to pay for more government.

In liberal states like Maryland and Massachusetts, we will have 4 Democratic senators instead of 2. How does that represent me better?

>>Who is going to pay the salary of all these senators?
>
>The people who pay them now. They get paid 200K a year, so if, in 2004 we decided that they should get paid 150K a year (which I think is still 3 times the national average *1) and that there should be four senators from each state, we would be going from a $20 million Senate salary to a $30 million salary. Considering the war on Iraq will cost us about $200 billion, a measly $10 million should be swingable.
>
>Would that work for a start?
>
>*1 http://www.census.gov/prod/2002pubs/p60-218.pdf page 21